WHAT COUNTS IS TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT, NOT NATURAL RESOURCES EXPLOITATION
![]() |
Countries
of Africa, especially Nigeria ,
pride themselves as being endowed with abundant natural resources, as if the
existence of natural resources in their countries came by their effort. When in some countries, people can show
man-made resources they have been able to create in addition to what nature has offered, people inAfrica
can only show and brag about what nature has offered, as if they made any
contribution to what nature has offered them.
existence of natural resources in their countries came by their effort. When in some countries, people can show
man-made resources they have been able to create in addition to what nature has offered, people in
It
is ironical that, though the continent of Africa
is richly endowed with natural resources, the people have remained poor. This
one thing has puzzled many: abundant natural resources in Africa ,
yet African countries are poor; whereas the countries of the industrialized
world, though with fewer natural resources are rich. Why is Japan , a country with just a few
trace of natural resources an advanced and rich country today?
The
answer to this question is technological development. Having so much endowment
of natural resources without technology is akin to having a financially viable
organization but with no business acumen and management tools to manage it.
Natural
resources are naturally given wealth; technology is man-made wealth. Natural
resources deplete and are mostly non-renewable; technology depreciates but is
replaceable, and can even be improved.
Even
when natural resources exist, technology is required to extract and put them
into useful form – giving them economic value. For instance, the technology of
drilling is required to extract crude oil from the layer of the earth where it
is found; the technology of refining is required to refine the crude oil
extracted – to give it economic value. Technology is required to mine solid
minerals.
Like
the governments of developed countries, the federal and state governments of Nigeria and
other African countries seek to attain economic growth. And how do they attain
it? For them, the expeditious means of attaining it is more exploitation of
natural resources in their lands.
An
economy whose growth is driven by natural resources would not go beyond
economic growth to economic development because more exploitation of natural
resources would mean more goods, and more goods implies economic growth and not
development. And where the goods consist mostly of commodities, the economy
becomes vulnerable to economic downturn, because prices of commodities are
volatile, whether mineral or agricultural commodities. When prices of
commodities plummet, the supposed additional monetary benefit of exploiting
more natural resources is nullified, yet leaving us with self-imposed disadvantaged
position of not maintaining natural resources sustainability for future
generations.
But
technological development brings about both economic growth and development: economic growth, because application of
technology in economic activities results in production of more goods and
services, especially capital goods; and economic
development, because technology brings about structural change of economic
sphere of life of a people or society. This explains why countries that are
endowed with natural resources but are not technologically developed have no
economic development.
Technology
is used to add value. Ability to add value makes one valuable and to be better
placed. A developing nation produces the raw materials; an industrialized or
developed nation adds value to the raw materials using technology. At the end
of the day, so much separates both nations. The industrialized nations are the
leading nations of the world because they possess ability to add value – they
are more valuable. They have better economies, better education systems,
stronger militaries, etc, all of which came through technology. Once a country
or society develops technologically, all spheres of its national life develop –
its economy, politics, education system, health system, sports, military, etc.
Through
technology, the status of China
and its people has changed in the 21st century. China is becoming a key player in
world affairs. The good performance of Chinese contingents in 2000, 2004, 2008
and 2012 Olympic Games attests to the fact that technological development can
bring about even sports development. The Chinese people use part of wealth they
make through technology to invest in sports development, including the huge
fund they are currently pouring into football development, and indeed other
aspects of their lives.
Really,
technology, and not natural resources, is the catalyst and determinant of
development. As the gap between rich and poor countries continues to expand, it
has become unarguable that technology rules the world, and not natural
resources such as oil, gold, diamond, etc.
The
striking gap that persists between rich and poor nations has increased many
fold over the decades. The superiority of technology driven societies over
societies driven by natural resources is getting more with the passing of time.
What
accounts for the advancement of the rich nations is home-made technology. So,
real development in Nigeria and
Africa would lie in pursuing technological
development at home, and NOT just technology transfer, where developing nations
remain recipients of developed nations’ technologies.
Throughout
history, it is evident that a nation’s real development lies in the attainment
of technological power, and not natural resources endowment and exploitation.
Technological Power Brings Military
Power
To
say that technology is everything is not an overstatement. With technology man
has conquered nature, and indeed, his fellow man.
Military
might is a function of technology. Every powerful nation in the world has a technology-driven
military. They are the strong, while others, who even depend on them, that is,
the superpowers, for their military needs (including arms and ammunition), are
the weak.
Throughout
the history of human existence, the strong has always invaded and preyed upon
the weak. That was the case in the 19th century when some European
powers invaded and colonized Africa .
Europeans
did not succeed in colonizing Africa because
they were physically stronger. In fact, Europeans incursion into the territory
of any tribe or people of Africa was
vehemently resisted. Each territory was colonized only after its people were
overrun by European forces in a bloody battle (or battles). The superiority of
the Europeans was in their technological superiority.
In
their combats with the natives of any territory of Africa ,
the Europeans used guns, gunboat, gunpowder and other arms and ammunition,
while bows and arrows, spears, and sometimes swords, were the weapons at the
disposal of Africans. The weapons of the Europeans were sophisticated and could
destroy lives many times more than that of Africans. So there were always heavy
casualties on the side of Africans, leading to defeat. Europeans’ occupation of
any African territory came only after its people were defeated by Europeans
forces. In the history of modern warfare, it is proven that the vastness of an
army does not determine it might, but its highly sophisticated weapons systems.
Those who control technology oppress those who do not, eventually enslaving
them and wielding power.
Technological Power Brings Economic
Power
Bill
Gates, founder of Microsoft Corporation, is a person that wields so much
economic power. His economic power came through technology – computer.
The
United States, Britain , Germany , France ,
Japan
are all economic giants. The economic power of these countries came through
technological power. Even the economies of China
and India ,
which are gradually assuming strategic position comparable with advanced economies,
have become what they are today because they became technologically-driven.
Sustainable
wealth creation and economic development do NOT come by export of natural
resources, such as oil. Countries like South Korea
and Malaysia , which were
once on a par with Nigeria ,
now outpace Nigeria
owing to their industrial policy of manufacturing, which has been improved and
sustained by their technological breakthroughs and innovations.
Technological Power Brings Potential
Maximization
Africans
in Africa do not maximize their potentials,
but Africans in technologically driven societies maximize their potentials.
Philip Emeagwali invented the fastest supercomputer; Jelani Aliyu designed a
state-of-art car in the United States .
A number of renowned doctors in Europe and America are Nigerians.
The
result of technology application to any sphere of human activity is high
performance. For countries that tread the path of technological development and
advancement, results of potential maximization are evident
Technological Power Brings Reduction
in Economic Inequality
Societies
with economies that are dependent on natural resources have a common feature: a
few privileged people taking control of the resources, diverting money from the
resources to themselves and wielding so much economic power by that. The
society’s resources become source of wealth to the few privileged ones, while
the vast majority with no access to the resources of the land has no source of
wealth – they languish in poverty. This accounts for the high percentage of
poor people and for the high level of economic inequality in such societies. Dependence
on commodities concentrates wealth in hands of the few, and leaves the majority
vulnerable to hardship and downturns.
In Medieval Europe, when European economies
were not driven by technology but by natural resources, there existed a class
of few people who controlled resources, known as lords (or feudal lord). The
feudal lords employed the serfs who did not own land, or who owned a small area
of land, and paid them undeserved wages.
But
with the outset of Industrial Revolution in Europe, the power of the lords
waned and there was complete change in the system of things in Europe – a change towards equality. The Industrial
Revolution marked the beginning of modern technological development in Europe . Technological inventions caused major positive
changes in Europe and paved way for the
development of the continent.
Ideally,
Technological development weakens economic dominance of the ruling class and
uplifts the economic status of the non-ruling class, reducing inequality in the
society. This is so because, arising from one’s technological invention(s), the
lowly placed can become influential. Patent right belongs to the inventor who
makes wealth according to how relevant, widely accepted and useful his/her
invention is to humanity. Compare the
status of Bill Gates, before and after his invention in computer technology.
In
developed countries, wealth is more evenly distributed than in developing
countries. The reason for this is that wealth in developing countries comes by
natural resources, which are controlled by the political class – those who
possess political power, and their relatives and allies. In the developed
countries wealth comes mostly by technology, which of course is NOT
“controlled” by the political class, but by the person, people or organization
that invent it. Widespread rate of abject poverty in a country’s population
reduces with the contribution of earnings from technological development to the
wealth of a country.
Technological Power May Bring
Reduction in Violent Conflict
The
quest for political power evokes conflicts not in itself but in the fact that
those who are in power command the control of economic resources or sources of
economic resources, whether directly or indirectly. So there are many who will
go any lengths to get political power. Owing to the ‘win-at-all-cost’ syndrome,
competition or struggle for political power turns violent. Violent conflicts
over control or sharing of political
power stem from the commonly held notion that wielding political power
is a sure bet to controlling natural resources.
Ultimately,
sovereignty rests with the government of a state. So at its discretion,
government could claim ownership and control of any resources in the land.
Those in government benefit immeasurably from government-controlled resources.
But those in power are people who merely received the mandate of other citizens
to run the affairs of the state on behalf of all. They are in position of
trust. But in Africa , position of trust is
more often than not used to better the lot of the occupier, leaving the fast
majority for whom power is held in misery.
But
the masses that have been excluded from having a fair share in the country’s
resources do know that the country’s resources belong ultimately to all the
citizens and every citizen should have a share in them, prompting some to do
something in that line. And for them, how do they do it? By stirring up or
engaging in violent conflicts over control or sharing of economic resources. This
accounts for the restiveness in the Niger Delta of Nigeria.
But
where technology becomes a major contributor to economic power, violent conflicts
over control or sharing of economic resources seem to wane.
Pursuing Technological Development
Deliberately and Vigorously
Undoubtedly,
a conscious, deliberate and vigorous pursuit of technological development is
the way to go for Nigeria
and other African countries. So far, overdependence on natural resources continues
to retard economic, political and social development of African countries from
independence to date.
But
I do not mean that we abandon exploitations of our natural resources, as our
countries’ current economic survival, to a great extend, depends on them. And I
do not know about our future economic survival as the natural resources may
cease to be the mainstay of our economies because they are non-renewable and
our present exploitation of the natural resources are without consideration of
sustainability.
A
major driver of technological innovations is home patronage, after which going
international becomes a consideration, thereby earnings revenue from abroad. With
increase in foreign earnings, an economy experiences a boom.
One
common argument against patronage of locally made goods is that they are of
less quality or less luxurious. But quality and luxury are not an event but a
process, and requires time. It is only when a manufacturer makes profit from
patronage that part of it can be ploughed back into research and development
for product improvement. The patronage of indigenous technology should begin
with government organizations and be made mandatory for government authorities,
except for product without local substitute. On the issue of low quality goods,
the government should launch an intervention programme to assist indigenous
companies improve quality – a friendly regulation approach that supports quality improvement.
Every
technological development drive begins with the unwavering policy direction and
intervention by the government. Some decades ago, the Indian Government pursued
vigorously science education programme for its citizens both at home and
abroad. A number of Indians studied science courses overseas, especially in the
United Kingdom .
That initiative produced Indian scientists, science-based professionals and
science teachers in large number. In fact, science teachers from India were present even in countries outside Asia . In Nigeria ,
for example, there were science teachers who were Indians in some secondary
schools, colleges and universities. Today, that laudable science education pursuit
initiative has come to fruition – a benefit that has placed India on the platform
of technological development.
In
Nigeria ,
one attitude is disheartening. Funds meant for research for capital
development, human development and capacity building are often diverted to
luxury. This is sacrificing a country’s better economic future for today’s
personal gains. Surely, luxury will
follow after breakthroughs in technological inventions and innovations are
attained, as economic prosperity usually accompanies technological
breakthroughs. Therefore, real and sustainable economic development should come
first, so Nigerians’ penchant for foreign luxuries at the expense of the
country’s overall progress should be done away with.
Again,
the attitude of not supporting and promoting local technology has been a clog
in the wheel of progress in the quest for technological development. Certain
imports have local substitutes. But if allowances are accruable for making
foreign trips for procurements, officers concerned would suggest importations
at the expense of patronizing indigenous producers.
AN APPEAL:
If you
found the content of this blog valuable, please support the development and maintenance
of a website, where many subject-matters would be discussed in categories. Please
contact me on: +234
7052802574 or at senaipia@gmail.com. No donation is too small!

Comments